top of page

Navigate to bottom of blog feed by clicking <back> on your web browser twice & then scrolling up. 

Search
telliottmbamsc

2/23 1,000s of Homeschools teach pro White Supremacy\pro NeoNazi as Koch ships Climate Denial texts

Updated: Jan 8

Eastern Tiger swallowtail (Papilio glaucus), female, dark color form

Ice Age National Scientific Reserve Unit, Wisconsin, USA

8/11/2015 288aaaa3 2023 Photos\Dislocated Images All Years


Home Schooling = Immersion in White Supremacy:

“Quote: " news outlets Vice and HuffPost wrote of an Ohio couple who had created a neo-Nazi-themed homeschooling channel, “Dissident Homeschool,” to distribute elementary school lesson plans to a group of 2,400 subscribers. Interested parents can download antisemitic and racist lesson plans to teach Nazi ideology, along with anti-LGBTQ+ videos and other hateful content."”


“How the internet supercharged white supremacist homeschooling

Extremists using homeschooling education to spread white supremacist ideology is becoming a growing problem.”


&


“Inside The Online Community Where Home-Schoolers Learn How To Turn Their Kids Into ‘Wonderful Nazis

A Telegram group called Dissident Homeschool has been a resource for neo-Nazis who want to teach their kids hate at home. Now its administrators have been unmasked.”


&


“An Ohio couple has been unmasked as leaders of the neo-Nazi “Dissident Homeschool” Telegram channel that distributes lesson plans to 2,400 members.”

“Inside a US Neo-Nazi Homeschool Network With Thousands of Members”


&


Koch runs the Heartland Institute that invariably coordinated the distribution of these “textbooks” with the homeschool Nazi white supremacy network. charles koch's dad was key to hitler realizing his holocaust:

“Heartland Institute Sends 8,000 Teachers Climate Denial 'Textbook'”


&


When Govt reimburses Charter\Voucher\Religious Schools operating costs the amount for facilities means taxpayers pay for the school operators purchase of the school.


This means working Taxpayers are paying for the school TWICE. Once to build it initially and once for the school scam operators purchase of it.


Truly one of the many horrors associated with stomping out those dirty socialist public schools! (sarcasm)


*


Democrats’ practice of forcing voters into the lesser of 2 evils is class warfare within the party waged against their own constituency.


Relatively wealthy Democrats who can afford not to feel the full weight of the Democratic Party’s failings are unaffected. They are content with the Party’s offering. You may see this reflected in the speech used by wealthy journalists when they write or talk about the party invariably in favorable tolerant terms. They will continue to vote Democrat.


But nonrich Democratic voters, who will feel the full force and effect of the Party’s failings, will be angered and dissatisfied. They don’t have the luxury of not complaining about their level of representation in their own government. They grow to view – correctly – that the rich are all who matter to both parties. Consequently, they look for an option that is not the Democratic party by the 2 parties’ monopoly over the political process precludes their finding a satisfactory solution.


Democrats breed disenfranchisement and give inertia to radical fringe groups. And pressure builds. And pressure builds.


Democrats are delivering us to authoritarian fascism


*


Forget draining the US Supreme Court’s piece of the swamp. With SCOTUS it’s more like we need to flush the toilet:


“We don’t need any new ideas to fix the Supreme Court. Just one very old one.

At least five members of the Supreme Court are comfortable ignoring the court’s past decisions and manipulating the law to achieve more conservative goals.”


Quote:

“No, not that spouse. This time we aren’t talking about Justice Clarence Thomas’ wife, Ginni Thomas, and her efforts to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election. This time we’re talking about Chief Justice John Roberts’ wife, Jane Sullivan Roberts, and her work as a legal recruiter. Here, the concern is that Sullivan Roberts’ work raises ethical questions because she has placed lawyers at firms that have cases before the Supreme Court.”



*

11 views0 comments

Comments

Rated 0 out of 5 stars.
No ratings yet

Add a rating
bottom of page