Pale Metanema (Metanema inatomaria)
Ice Age National Scientific Reserve Unit, Wisconsin, USA
2017-05-26 254aaa
“Temperatures are rising at super speed in the US / The US is heating up faster than the planet, and that’s already brought changes to every corner of the country.”
“Earthjustice Reacts to Biden Administration’s Approval of Willow Project in Alaska
Decision greenlights a carbon bomb and opens decades of oil drilling in Western Arctic”
GENOCIDE:
When it comes to today’s climate you can NOT offset any amount of additional Green house gas emissions –much less the gargantuan emissions from the Willow project - with moves, that should be done anyway, meant to pacify environmentalists.
*Today* the Willow project will not only worsen the end of organized societies body count,
but also reveal the truly cynical & wildly insincere merely sound-bite nature of the 30% set-asides meant to stave off extinctions for land and ocean species.
It is a ghoulish decimation of the fake hopium Washington spends so much of its time trying to cultivate.
Democrats’ Willow oil project is overkill of an already functionally dead planet
Here are some stats on the project:
“three drilling pads, which combined will produce 92% of the oil ConocoPhillips initially sought to develop,
a staggering climate impact amounting to more than 260 million metric tons of greenhouse gases (GHG).
The GHG emissions from Willow will equal that of 56 million cars driven for one year, or nearly 70 coal fired power plants operating for one year.
This project is also intended to be a stepping-stone for future development. ConocoPhillips has described Willow to its investors as the “next great Alaska hub,” saying it had identified up to 3 billion barrels of nearby prospects that could be accessed if the Willow infrastructure were in place.
ConocoPhillips holds about 1 million of the 2.5 million acres already under lease in the National Petroleum Reserve-Alaska.”
And here are the crumbs to pacify the little people who think Democrats doing the bare minimum at this point will make a difference:
“As part of the decision to approve Willow, the Biden administration also finished the job of protecting federal Arctic waters from new oil and gas leasing and announced a process to increase protections of important biological areas in the Western Arctic. These are positive steps, and we applaud them. However, they cannot compensate for the harm and disruption to the climate and to the Western Arctic and its residents that Willow would inflict for years to come.
Willow — set to become the largest new oil project on U.S. public lands — will also permanently alter the globally significant and ecologically rich Western Arctic by disrupting animal migration patterns, eroding precious habitat, harming subsistence practices, and posing unacceptable health risks for Alaska Native communities.”
“Biden will approve Alaska oil project, alongside arctic protections”
…that won’t make a difference in the long run. Look at the wording describing willow as the “next great Alaska hub” – Democrats are just pushing another payday of donations from Conoco Phillips to some point in the future when these protections will be cast aside like they never existed – especially given Conoco’s investment in the area:
A relatively minute handful of crumbs amounting to mere peanuts for the nonrich reportedly to bring the cost of living down (making it easier to work for increasing less) in the wake of a clear act of Genocide against the same people by approving the Willow pocket.
First he kills the future and then tells us he is making things better for us.
Pro-Willow because of jobs & energy independence?:
1 jobs that will cost the general economy more than they will benefit.
Jobs working toward your own suicide & digging your child’s grave.
Jobs that have you destroying organized civilization when a viable society is the whole reason you need wages in the first place.
I suppose they next argument will be you want to work in the greenhouse gas generating industry because you need to buy supplies so you can go hunting,…during a the Mass Extinction you helped create.
Maybe you should demand that your job with big oil pay you in the form of food
2 if big oil (aka Washington) really wanted energy independence then why do they export vast quantities of fossil fuels?
Diminishing domestic supplies of energy product via export in the name of achieving energy is like saying your engaging in sexual intercourse to promote virginity.
*At this juncture in human history it is DISeconomic to engage in fossil fuels
Sociopathic lack of empathy – to the point of genocide - is included in “competent”:
“25th Amendment: How do we decide whether the president is competent?”
“How to Recognize Signs of Sociopathy
An expert explains whether you can tell if you have sociopathy”
“Biden Administration Approves Huge Alaska Oil Project
The administration also announced new limits on Arctic drilling in an apparent effort to temper criticism over the $8 billion Willow oil project, which has faced sharp opposition.”
The environment is as good as dead and that is a death that coming fast:
With the death of nature comes the death of food.
CHARGE THEM ALL WITH ATTEMPTED OMNICIDE:
Peter Carter:
“TOO LATE TO SAVE THE ENVIRONMENT --GREEN FOUNDER
BBC Michael Benfield, who helped set up the new political movement in the 1970s, said he believed the "battle for the world's environmental survival" was "at this moment, lost.
Speaking at an event to mark the party's 50th anniversary, Mr Benfield told the BBC he had become "somewhat of a doomsayer" about efforts to protect the environment.
"I think we have succeeded in helping to educate... but we have failed in dealing with the battle for environmental survival.
Today's science says he is tragically right
Democrats’ approval of Arctic oil development – as well as setting up all of the arctic for future expansion for big oil – has nothing to do with what the American People Want:
“Westerners support 100% clean energy, less oil drilling — even in red states”
“The U.S. must move to a greener, fairer energy economy. Public lands and waters should be a part of that future. 🌿
How? The agencies who manage these lands must prioritize climate protection, human connections and conservation – not corporate profits.”
HUMANS ARE NOW FUNCTIONALLY EXTINCT
The situation is dire in many respects, including poor conditions of sea ice, levels of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere, extreme weather causing droughts, flooding and storms, land suffering from deforestation, desertification, groundwater depletion and increased salinity, and oceans suffering from ocean heat, oxygen depletion, acidification, stratification, etc. These are the conditions that we're already in now.
On top of that, the outlook over the next few years is grim. Circumstances are making the situation even more dire, such as the emerging El Niño, a high peak in sunspots, the Tonga eruption that added a huge amount of water vapor to the atmosphere. Climate models often average out such circumstances, but over the next few years the peaks just seem to be piling up, while the world keeps expanding fossil fuel use and associated infrastructure that increases the Urban Heat Island Effect.
As a result, feedbacks look set to kick in with ever greater ferocity, while developments such as crossing of tipping points could take place with the potential to drive humans (and many other species) into extinction within years. The temperature on land on the Northern Hemisphere may rise so strongly that much traffic, transport and industrial activity could suddenly grind to a halt, resulting in a reduction in cooling aerosols that are now masking the full wrath of global heating. Temperatures could additionally rise due to an increase in warming aerosols and gases as a result of more biomass and waste burning and forest fires.
As a final straw breaking the camel's back, the world keeps appointing omnicidal maniacs who act in conflict with best-available scientific analysis including warnings that humans will likely go fully extinct with a 3°C rise.
From the post 'We are now in the Suicene', at:
Willow point\Class Warfare\Genocide\ Human Extinction: increasing green house gas emissions TODAY on the assumption that at some point in the future the required abatement can be achieved by some miraculous technology the planet’s feedback mechanisms can’t compete with is saying you don’t, as a public servant, have a problem with the high probability of risking the lives of billions of people and causing irreparable damage to the entire planet to ensure increasing the wealth of a relatively very small group of individuals
That’s not reasonable or even remotely sensible. It only makes sense if you place no value on human life - starting at the low point of the global socio-economic scale and moving up.
This is especially the case when completely viable alternatives exist but are refused because of political ideology.
A political ideology whose values clearly indicate this would be done to achieve social cleansing. In fact, certain of the members to this ideology have stated precisely that - publicly.
“Honest Government Ad | Net Zero (feat. Greta Thunberg)”
Commentaires