2019-06-19 _F2A6701aaa2
Not a chance. They are counting on the next pandemic to kill off the nonwhite and or nonrich:
“To make sure that COVID is the last pandemic of such devastation, political leaders must change their mindset and take these actions.
This is editorially independent content funded by a grant from @AstraZeneca and produced with support from @Modernatx. Sponsors have no influence on reporting.”
“Political Leaders Must Act Now to Thwart the Next Pandemic
To make sure that COVID is the last pandemic of such devastation, political leaders must change their mindset and take these actions”
*
Given today’s facts & circumstances, recent warnings of +18.4C by 2026 come across as a whole different type of sobering
Say, the 18.4C estimate has large margin of error and the actual increase may be in fact only 14 C by 2026. Now assume Washington finally abandons the fake solution of carbon capture, realizes the initiatives in the inflation reduction act are simply not responsive to the problem (eg 85% of new GHG emissions are coming from feedback and not man), and can produce meaningful climate warming abatement processes and can flip the on switch of these abatement processes tomorrow as to start returning actual climate benefits effective tomorrow (no “investment”, “legislative approval”, or “being built” time delays), we can cut the revised +14C rise in half, say only to +7C rise by 2026, that still leaves mankind deeply in the red when it comes to complete extinction of mankind only needing +3 to +4 C. NOT GOOD. And what are the chances washington can rise to the occasion - even if it were possible!? 0.0%
*
Main stream media is inflating the significance of COP15’s biodiversity assistance. The correct sound bite is ‘80% set aside by 2025’:
“"Away from Cop15, rewilding came to the fore in 2022, with projects across the globe, from the reintroduction of bison and cluster rewilding in the UK to big ambitions in Argentina, lessons learned in the Netherlands and the US, and the 10th Rewilding Europe project launched. Leonardo DiCaprio and Ellie Goulding were two celebrities who expressed their support for the movement during the Age of Extinction’s Wild world project.
"As we enter 2023, many are gaining inspiration from the past, with an uptick in regenerative farming, the return of ancient crops such as buckwheat and Welsh oats, and the harnessing of ancient irrigation systems. Others are looking forward, taking innovate steps in conservation, including collecting fog, turning bus stops into homes for pollinators and utilizing artificial intelligence."”
“2022: the year rewilding went mainstream – and a biodiversity deal gave the world hope”
*
“Capitalism is the best because it works in accord with the laws of nature. Darwin. Natural selection. Best genes. Only the strong survive!”
“Actually, Darwin stressed that the struggle for the means of existence among animals is replaced by cooperation, which secures the best conditions for the survival of all species.”
Also Darwin observed an organically occurring world of nature. Not of a particular species artifices.
So best genes becomes a question of best for what? Survival? Not necessarily. More like survival defined as a specific pattern of consumption (that of the rich) which really doesn’t have much to do with thriving in a green wilderness.
Comments